Finding D-optimal designs by randomised decomposition and switching
Richard P. Brent

TL;DR
This paper introduces a randomized decomposition and switching method to find and generate D-optimal designs, especially for orders where the Hadamard bound isn't attainable, leading to new and conjectured optimal matrices.
Contribution
It presents a novel randomized decomposition and switching approach to generate D-optimal designs for specific matrix orders, including new and conjectured solutions.
Findings
Generated new saturated D-optimal designs for order 26.
Produced conjectured saturated D-optimal designs for orders 27 and 33.
Demonstrated the effectiveness of the method in exploring non-Hadamard cases.
Abstract
The Hadamard maximal determinant (maxdet) problem is to find the maximum determinant D(n) of a square {+1, -1} matrix of given order n. Such a matrix with maximum determinant is called a saturated D-optimal design. We consider some cases where n > 2 is not divisible by 4, so the Hadamard bound is not attainable, but bounds due to Barba or Ehlich and Wojtas may be attainable. If R is a matrix with maximal (or conjectured maximal) determinant, then G = RR^T is the corresponding Gram matrix. For the cases that we consider, maximal or conjectured maximal Gram matrices are known. We show how to generate many Hadamard equivalence classes of solutions from a given Gram matrix G, using a randomised decomposition algorithm and row/column switching. In particular, we consider orders 26, 27 and 33, and obtain new saturated D-optimal designs (for order 26) and new conjectured saturated D-optimal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsgraph theory and CDMA systems · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems
