False starts in history of searches for double beta decay, or Discoverless double beta decay
V. I. Tretyak

TL;DR
This paper reviews historical false starts in the search for double beta decay, highlighting cases where initial discoveries were later refuted through further investigations.
Contribution
It compiles and analyzes historical cases of false claims in double beta decay research, providing insights into the scientific process and challenges in this field.
Findings
Multiple initial claims of double beta decay were later disproven.
Refutations contributed to refining experimental methods and understanding.
Historical analysis aids future research in avoiding similar pitfalls.
Abstract
A collection of stories is presented on discoveries of double beta decay (including neutrinoless one) which were refuted in the subsequent investigations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
