Simulating protostellar evolution and radiative feedback in the cluster environment
Mikhail Klassen, Ralph E. Pudritz, Thomas Peters

TL;DR
This study compares two prestellar models in simulations of star formation, revealing that a self-consistent model results in less ionizing radiation, affecting star mass distribution and HII region dynamics.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates a self-consistent prestellar model within radiative feedback simulations, highlighting its impact on stellar and ionization properties.
Findings
Self-consistent model yields 8% lower peak stellar mass.
Reduced mass difference between two largest stars from 14 to 7.5 Msun.
HII regions flicker on timescales under 560 years.
Abstract
Radiative feedback is among the most important consequences of clustered star formation inside molecular clouds. At the onset of star formation, radiation from massive stars heats the surrounding gas, which suppresses the formation of many low-mass stars. When simulating pre-main-sequence stars, their stellar properties must be defined by a prestellar model. Different approaches to prestellar modeling may yield quantitatively different results. In this paper, we compare two existing prestellar models under identical initial conditions to gauge whether the choice of model has any significant effects on the final population of stars. The first model treats stellar radii and luminosities with a ZAMS model, while separately estimating the accretion luminosity by interpolating to published prestellar tracks. The second, more accurate prestellar model self-consistently evolves the radius and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
