Swift follow-up observations of unclassified ASCA sources
N. Degenaar, R.L.C. Starling, P.A. Evans, A.P. Beardmore, D.N., Burrows, E.M. Cackett, S. Campana, D. Grupe, J. Kennea, A. Moretti, C., Pagani, K.L. Page, V. La Parola, R. Wijnands

TL;DR
This study uses Swift follow-up observations to identify and characterize faint, unclassified X-ray sources from the ASCA surveys, revealing their nature and improving positional accuracy.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed X-ray spectral and variability analysis of these sources, identifying several as accreting compact objects and improving source localization.
Findings
46% detection rate of ASCA sources with Swift/XRT
Identification of three accreting compact objects
Detection of three possible stellar counterparts
Abstract
We present Swift follow-up observations of a sample of 35 unclassified faint X-ray sources drawn from the ASCA Galactic centre and plane surveys. Our short pointed XRT observations allow detections down to a limiting 0.3-10 keV flux of ~1E-13 erg cm-2 s-1, which translates into a luminosity of ~1E33 erg s-1 for an assumed distance of D=8 kpc. The brightest source in our sample reaches a maximum 0.3-10 keV luminosity of ~2E36 (D/8kpc)^2 erg s-1 during our observations. We detect 16 (46%) of the ASCA sources with the XRT, while 19 were not detected during our program. Since we are probing the faint end of the ASCA source populations, we expect a large fraction of the non-detections to be due to the Eddington bias. This is strengthened by the fact that we find the observed XRT count rates to be predominantly lower than expected based on the reported ASCA intensities. Investigation of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
