Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions
Benoit Famaey, Stacy McGaugh

TL;DR
This paper reviews Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) as an alternative to dark matter, highlighting its observational successes, challenges, and various relativistic extensions across astrophysical scales.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of MOND's observational phenomenology, theoretical developments, and its potential as a relativistic gravity modification.
Findings
MOND explains many galactic rotation curves without dark matter
Relativistic extensions like TeVeS and BIMOND aim to embed MOND in gravity theories
Challenges remain in fully reconciling MOND with cosmological observations
Abstract
A wealth of astronomical data indicate the presence of mass discrepancies in the Universe. The motions observed in a variety of classes of extragalactic systems exceed what can be explained by the mass visible in stars and gas. Either (i) there is a vast amount of unseen mass in some novel form - dark matter - or (ii) the data indicate a breakdown of our understanding of dynamics on the relevant scales, or (iii) both. Here, we first review a few outstanding challenges for the dark matter interpretation of mass discrepancies in galaxies, purely based on observations and independently of any alternative theoretical framework. We then show that many of these puzzling observations are predicted by one single relation - Milgrom's law - involving an acceleration constant (or a characteristic surface density) of the order of the square-root of the cosmological constant in natural units. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
