Comment on "Unconventional Magnetism in a Nitrogen-Containing Analog of Cupric Oxide"
Alexander A. Tsirlin, Helge Rosner

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates the proposed magnetic model for CuNCN, demonstrating it does not support the RVB state and suggesting the magnetic state may be homogeneous, challenging prior interpretations of inhomogeneous magnetism.
Contribution
It refutes the applicability of the anisotropic triangular lattice model to CuNCN and questions the existence of an inhomogeneous magnetic state as previously claimed.
Findings
The ATL model does not apply to CuNCN.
The ATL model does not support the RVB ground state.
CuNCN's magnetic state may be homogeneous.
Abstract
In a recent Letter [PRL, 107, 047208 (2011)], Zorko et al. report on an "unexpected inhomogeneous magnetism" related to "a peculiar fragility" of the resonating-valence-bond (RVB) electronic state in the spin-1/2 quantum magnet CuNCN. Here, we show that: i) the spin model of the anisotropic triangular lattice (ATL), as proposed by Zorko et al., does not apply to CuNCN; ii) this model does not support the proclaimed RVB ground state in the relevant parameter range; iii) the magnetic state of CuNCN is not necessarily inhomogeneous.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInorganic Chemistry and Materials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
