Sunyaev-Zel'dovich clusters in Millennium Gas simulations
Scott T. Kay (1), Michael W. Peel (1), C. J. Short (2), Peter A., Thomas (2), Owain E. Young (2), Richard A. Battye (1), Andrew R. Liddle (2),, Frazer R. Pearce (3) ((1) Manchester, (2) Sussex, (3) Nottingham)

TL;DR
This study uses Millennium Gas simulations to analyze the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect in galaxy clusters, confirming the tight Y_{500}-M_{500} relation's insensitivity to gas physics and its evolution, with implications for observational bias and cluster physics.
Contribution
First comprehensive analysis of SZ cluster properties across models with different gas physics using large simulations, confirming the relation's stability and agreement with recent observational data.
Findings
Y_{500}-M_{500} relation has very little scatter (~0.04) and is insensitive to gas physics.
Scaling relations agree with recent Planck and XMM-Newton data.
Projection effects do not bias the integrated SZ signal, but increase scatter in pre-heating models.
Abstract
We have exploited the large-volume Millennium Gas cosmological N-body hydrodynamics simulations to study the SZ cluster population at low and high redshift, for three models with varying gas physics. We confirm previous results using smaller samples that the intrinsic (spherical) Y_{500}-M_{500} relation has very little scatter (sigma_{log_{10}Y}~0.04), is insensitive to cluster gas physics and evolves to redshift one in accord with self-similar expectations. Our pre-heating and feedback models predict scaling relations that are in excellent agreement with the recent analysis from combined Planck and XMM-Newton data by the Planck Collaboration. This agreement is largely preserved when r_{500} and M_{500} are derived using the hydrostatic mass proxy, Y_{X,500}, albeit with significantly reduced scatter (sigma_{log_{10}Y}~0.02), a result that is due to the tight correlation between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
