Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that linguistic echoing in group discussions reveals power dynamics, with a framework that applies across different contexts like online communities and legal debates.

Contribution

It introduces a linguistic coordination framework to detect power relationships from natural language interactions across diverse social settings.

Findings

Linguistic echoing correlates with power differences.

The framework applies to online and formal debate contexts.

Echoing patterns reveal static and situational power dynamics.

Abstract

Understanding social interaction within groups is key to analyzing online communities. Most current work focuses on structural properties: who talks to whom, and how such interactions form larger network structures. The interactions themselves, however, generally take place in the form of natural language --- either spoken or written --- and one could reasonably suppose that signals manifested in language might also provide information about roles, status, and other aspects of the group's dynamics. To date, however, finding such domain-independent language-based signals has been a challenge. Here, we show that in group discussions power differentials between participants are subtly revealed by how much one individual immediately echoes the linguistic style of the person they are responding to. Starting from this observation, we propose an analysis framework based on linguistic coordination that can be used to shed light on power relationships and that works consistently across multiple types of power --- including a more "static" form of power based on status differences, and a more "situational" form of power in which one individual experiences a type of dependence on another. Using this framework, we study how conversational behavior can reveal power relationships in two very different settings: discussions among Wikipedians and arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court.