Covariant Gauge Fixing and Canonical Quantization

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new covariant measure definition for path integrals in gauge theories with first class constraints, compatible with covariant gauges, demonstrated on Yang-Mills, spin-two, and 2D Einstein-Hilbert theories.

Contribution

It proposes an alternative covariant measure construction for canonical path integrals using phase space generators, unifying covariant gauge fixing with canonical quantization.

Findings

Successfully applied to Yang-Mills theory

Extended to spin-two fields

Demonstrated on 2D Einstein-Hilbert action

Abstract

Theories that contain first class constraints possess gauge invariance which results in the necessity of altering the measure in the associated quantum mechanical path integral. If the path integral is derived from the canonical structure of the theory, then the choice of gauge conditions used in constructing Faddeev's measure cannot be covariant. This shortcoming is normally overcome either by using the "Faddeev-Popov" quantization procedure, or by the approach of Batalin-Fradkin-Fradkina-Vilkovisky, and then demonstrating that these approaches are equivalent to the path integral constructed from the canonical approach with Faddeev's measure. We propose in this paper an alternate way of defining the measure for the path integral when it is constructed using the canonical procedure for theories containing first class constraints and that this new approach can be used in conjunction with covariant gauges. This procedure follows the Faddeev-Popov approach, but rather than working with the form of the gauge transformation in configuration space, it employs the generator of the gauge transformation in phase space. We demonstrate this approach to the path integral by applying it to Yang-Mills theory, a spin-two field and the first order Einstein-Hilbert action in two dimensions. The problems associated with defining the measure for theories containing second-class constraints and ones in which there are fewer secondary first class constraints than primary first class constraints are discussed.