How can a glacial inception be predicted?
Michel Crucifix

TL;DR
This paper explores the unpredictability of glacial inception timing due to climate system sensitivities and disturbances, proposing a Bayesian inference approach to better quantify uncertainties in climate predictions.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian inference network framework to integrate climate physics, dynamics, and paleoclimate data for improved glacial cycle prediction.
Findings
Small disturbances can cause significant delays in glacial events.
Climate system sensitivities are crucial for understanding glacial cycle variability.
A probabilistic approach can help quantify uncertainties in climate predictions.
Abstract
The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis considers that greenhouse gas concentrations should have declined during the Holocene in absence of humankind activity, leading to glacial inception around the present. It partly relies on the fact that present levels of northern summer incoming solar radiation are close to those that, in the past, preceded a glacial inception phenomenon, associated to declines in greenhouse gas concentrations. However, experiments with various numerical models of glacial cycles show that next glacial inception may still be delayed by several ten thousands of years, even with the assumption of greenhouse gas concentration declines during the Holocene. Furthermore, as we show here, conceptual models designed to capture the gross dynamics of the climate system as a whole suggest also that small disturbances may sometimes cause substantial delays in glacial events,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
