Relativistic calculations of the K-K charge transfer and K-vacancy production probabilities in low-energy ion-atom collisions
I. I. Tupitsyn, Y. S. Kozhedub, V. M. Shabaev, A. I. Bondarev, G. B., Deyneka, I. A. Maltsev, S. Hagmann, G. Plunien, and Th. Stoehlker

TL;DR
This paper extends a relativistic computational method to evaluate charge transfer and vacancy production probabilities in low-energy ion-atom collisions, providing results consistent with experimental data.
Contribution
It introduces a relativistic approach using active electron approximation for calculating charge transfer and vacancy probabilities in ion-atom collisions.
Findings
Calculated K-K charge transfer probabilities for Ne-F$^{8+}$ collisions.
Determined K-vacancy production probabilities for Xe-Xe$^{53+}$ collisions.
Results agree with experimental data and other theoretical models.
Abstract
The previously developed technique for evaluation of charge-transfer and electron-excitation processes in low-energy heavy-ion collisions [I.I. Tupitsyn et al., Phys. Rev. A 82, 042701(2010)] is extended to collisions of ions with neutral atoms. The method employs the active electron approximation, in which only the active electron participates in the charge transfer and excitation processes while the passive electrons provide the screening DFT potential. The time-dependent Dirac wave function of the active electron is represented as a linear combination of atomic-like Dirac-Fock-Sturm orbitals, localized at the ions (atoms). The screening DFT potential is calculated using the overlapping densities of each ions (atoms), derived from the atomic orbitals of the passive electrons. The atomic orbitals are generated by solving numerically the one-center Dirac-Fock and Dirac-Fock-Sturm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
