Intercomparison Study of Time and Frequency Transfer between VLBI and Other Techniques (GPS, ETS8(TCE), TW(DPN) and DMTD)
Hiroshi Takiguchi, Moritaka Kimura, Tetsuro Kondo, Atsutoshi Ishii,, Hobiger Thomas, Ryuichi Ichikawa, Yasuhiro Koyama, Yasuhiro Takahashi,, Fumimaru Nakagawa, Maho Nakamura, Ryo Tabuchi, Shigeru Tsutshiya, Shinichi, Hama, Tadahiro Gotoh, Miho Fujieda, Masanori Aida, Tingyu Li

TL;DR
This study compares VLBI with GPS, ETS8(TCE), TW(DPN), and DMTD techniques for time and frequency transfer, demonstrating VLBI's stability and accuracy relative to other methods.
Contribution
It provides an intercomparison of VLBI with other time transfer techniques, highlighting VLBI's stability and measurement accuracy since 2007.
Findings
VLBI is more stable than GPS.
VLBI is slightly noisier than TW(DPN) and ETS8(TCE).
VLBI measures time differences as accurately as ETS8(TCE).
Abstract
We carried out the intercomparison experiments between VLBI and other techniques to show the capability of VLBI time and frequency transfer by using the current geodetic VLBI technique and facilities as the summary of the experiments that we carried out since 2007. The results from the two different types of experiments show that the VLBI is more stable than GPS but is slightly noisier than two new two-way techniques (TW(DPN), ETS8(TCE)), and VLBI can measure the correct time difference as same as ETS8(TCE).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards · GNSS positioning and interference · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
