Polarimetry of the transient relativistic jet of GRB 110328 / Swift J164449.3+573451
K. Wiersema, A. J. van der Horst, A. J. Levan, N. R. Tanvir, R., Karjalainen, A. Kamble, C. Kouveliotou, B. D. Metzger, D. M. Russell, I., Skillen, R. L. C. Starling, R. A. M. J. Wijers

TL;DR
This study investigates the polarization properties of the transient relativistic jet in Swift J164449.3+573451 across infrared and radio wavelengths to understand jet physics and source geometry, finding modest infrared polarization and no radio polarization.
Contribution
It provides the first deep infrared polarimetry of this transient and constrains radio polarization, offering insights into jet interaction and magnetic field structure in a tidal disruption event.
Findings
Infrared linear polarization detected at ~7%
No significant radio polarization detected at 1.4 and 4.8 GHz
Radio emission consistent with jet-medium interaction models
Abstract
We present deep infrared (Ks band) imaging polarimetry and radio (1.4 and 4.8 GHz) polarimetry of the enigmatic transient Swift J164449.3+573451. This source appears to be a short lived jet phenomenon in a galaxy at redshift z = 0.354, activated by a sudden mass accretion onto the central massive black hole, possibly caused by the tidal disruption of a star. We aim to find evidence for this scenario through linear polarimetry, as linear polarisation is a sensitive probe of jet physics, source geometry and the various mechanisms giving rise to the observed radiation. We find a formal Ks band polarisation measurement of P_lin = 7.4 +/- 3.5 % (including systematic errors). Our radio observations show continuing brightening of the source, which allows sensitive searches for linear polarisation as a function of time. We find no evidence of linear polarisation at radio wavelengths of 1.4 GHz…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
