Maladaptation and the paradox of robustness in evolution
Steven A. Frank

TL;DR
This paper uses a mathematical model to explore how robustness mechanisms in organisms, while protecting against perturbations, can paradoxically lead to reduced adaptive performance and maladaptation over evolutionary time.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretical framework analyzing the evolutionary trade-offs between robustness and adaptive performance, revealing the paradoxical effects of buffering mechanisms.
Findings
Enhanced robustness reduces natural selection on adaptive traits.
Buffering mechanisms can lead to lower performance and maladaptation.
Layered buffering traits may replace high-performance adaptive traits.
Abstract
Background. Organisms use a variety of mechanisms to protect themselves against perturbations. For example, repair mechanisms fix damage, feedback loops keep homeostatic systems at their setpoints, and biochemical filters distinguish signal from noise. Such buffering mechanisms are often discussed in terms of robustness, which may be measured by reduced sensitivity of performance to perturbations. Methodology/Principal Findings. I use a mathematical model to analyze the evolutionary dynamics of robustness in order to understand aspects of organismal design by natural selection. I focus on two characters: one character performs an adaptive task; the other character buffers the performance of the first character against perturbations. Increased perturbations favor enhanced buffering and robustness, which in turn decreases sensitivity and reduces the intensity of natural selection on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
