The axioms for n-angulated categories
Petter Andreas Bergh, Marius Thaule

TL;DR
This paper explores the foundational axioms of n-angulated categories, introducing a higher octahedral axiom and demonstrating its equivalence to existing axioms, thereby clarifying the structure of these categories.
Contribution
It introduces a higher octahedral axiom for n-angulated categories and proves its equivalence to the mapping cone axiom, enhancing the theoretical framework.
Findings
Higher octahedral axiom is equivalent to the mapping cone axiom.
For triangulated categories, various octahedral axioms are equivalent.
Clarifies the axiomatic structure of n-angulated categories.
Abstract
We discuss the axioms for an n-angulated category, recently introduced by Geiss, Keller and Oppermann. In particular, we introduce a higher octahedral axiom, and show that it is equivalent to the mapping cone axiom for an n-angulated category. For a triangulated category, the mapping cone axiom, our octahedral axiom and the classical octahedral axiom are all equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
