Multiplicity, average transverse momentum and azimuthal anisotropy in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV using AMPT model
Md. Rihan Haque, Zi-Wei Lin, and Bedangadas Mohanty

TL;DR
This study uses the AMPT model to analyze how different uranium collision configurations affect particle multiplicity, flow, and anisotropy, revealing significant variations compared to gold collisions and highlighting the impact of nuclear shape and collision geometry.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of U+U collision configurations on flow and anisotropy observables using the AMPT model at 200 GeV.
Findings
U+U collisions increase charged particle multiplicity by 15-40% over Au+Au.
Tip-to-tip collisions produce the highest Nch, ET, and <pT> values.
v2 correlates with eccentricity and can be significantly larger in U+U than in Au+Au.
Abstract
Using a multi-phase transport (AMPT) model that includes the implementation of deformed Uranium nuclei, we have studied the centrality dependence of the charged particle multiplicity, <pT>, eccentricity (e2), triangularity (e3), their fluctuations, elliptic flow (v2) and triangular flow (v3) for different configurations of U+U collisions at midrapidity for \sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV. The results are compared to the corresponding observations from Au+Au collisions. We find that for the U+U collisions the dNch/d\eta at midrapidity is enhanced by about 15-40% depending on the collision and model configuration chosen, compared to Au+Au collisions. The tip-to-tip collisions leads to the largest values of Nch,transverse energy (ET) and <pT>. The <e2> and its fluctuation shows a rich centrality dependence, whereas not much variations are observed for <e3> and its fluctuations. The U+U side-on-side…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
