X-ray and Multiwavelength Insights into the Nature of Weak Emission-Line Quasars at Low Redshift
Jianfeng Wu, W. N. Brandt, Scott F. Anderson, Aleksandar M., Diamond-Stanic, Patrick B. Hall, Richard M. Plotkin, Donald P. Schneider,, Ohad Shemmer

TL;DR
This study investigates the X-ray and multiwavelength characteristics of low-redshift weak emission-line quasars, revealing diverse properties and potential classifications, including analogs to known weak-line quasars and possible BL Lac objects.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of low-redshift WLQs' X-ray and multiwavelength properties, highlighting their diversity and potential physical models.
Findings
X-ray weak WLQs resemble PHL 1811 analogs with harder spectra.
Some WLQs have normal X-ray-to-UV flux ratios, similar to typical quasars.
A small fraction may be BL Lac objects, showing strong X-ray emission.
Abstract
(Abridged) We report on the X-ray and multiwavelength properties of 11 radio-quiet quasars with weak or no emission lines identified by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) with redshift z=0.4-2.5. The distribution of relative X-ray brightness for our low-redshift weak-line quasar (WLQ) candidates is significantly different from that of typical radio-quiet quasars, having an excess of X-ray weak sources, but it is consistent with that of high-redshift WLQs. The X-ray weak sources generally show similar UV emission-line properties to those of the X-ray weak quasar PHL 1811; they may belong to the notable class of PHL 1811 analogs. The average X-ray spectrum of these sources is somewhat harder than that of typical radio-quiet quasars. Several other low-redshift WLQ candidates have normal ratios of X-ray-to-optical/UV flux, and their average X-ray spectral properties are also similar to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
