Gamma-Ray Bursts: the Isotropic-Equivalent-Energy Function and the Cosmic Formation Rate

TL;DR

This study constructs the isotropic-equivalent-energy function for gamma-ray bursts, revealing cosmic evolution and a broken power-law distribution, and compares the GRB formation rate with cosmic star formation history.

Contribution

First to construct the isotropic-equivalent-energy function for GRBs and analyze its evolution and distribution in relation to redshift.

Findings

Identified an excess of high-redshift GRBs.

Found a cosmic evolution of $E_{iso}$ proportional to $(1+z)^{1.80}$.

The GRB formation rate aligns with cosmic star formation rate.

Abstract

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are brief but intense emission of soft $\gamma-$rays, mostly lasting from a few seconds to a few thousand seconds. For such kind of high energy transients, their isotropic-equivalent-energy ($E_{\rm iso}$) function may be more scientifically meaningful when compared with GRB isotropic-equivalent-luminosity function ($L_{\rm iso}$), as the traditional luminosity function refers to steady emission much longer than a few thousand seconds. In this work we for the first time construct the isotropic-equivalent-energy function for a sample of 95 bursts with measured redshifts ($z$) and find an excess of high-$z$ GRBs. Assuming that the excess is caused by a GRB luminosity function evolution in a power-law form, we find a cosmic evolution of $E_{\rm iso}\propto(1+z)^{1.80^{+0.36}_{-0.63}}$, which is comparable to that between $L_{\rm iso}$ and $z$, i.e., $L_{\rm iso}\propto(1+z)^{2.30^{+0.56}_{-0.51}}$ (both $1\sigma$). The evolution-removed isotropic-equivalent-energy function can be reasonably fitted by a broken power-law, in which the dim and bright segments are $\psi(E_{\rm iso})\propto E_{\rm iso}^{-0.27\pm0.01}$ and $\psi(E_{\rm iso})\propto E_{\rm iso}^{-0.87\pm0.07}$, respectively ($1\sigma$). For the cosmic GRB formation rate, it increases quickly in the region of $0 \leq z \lesssim 1$, and roughly keeps constant for $1\lesssim z \lesssim 4$, and finally falls with a power index of $-3.80\pm2.16$ for $z\gtrsim 4$, in good agreement with the observed cosmic star formation rate so far.