On the relativistic precession and oscillation frequencies of test particles around rapidly rotating compact stars
Leonardo A. Pachon, Jorge A. Rueda, Cesar A. Valenzuela-Toledo

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the accuracy of analytic spacetime models, especially the PRS solution, in predicting orbital frequencies around rapidly rotating neutron stars, aiding in distinguishing black holes from neutron stars and probing nuclear matter properties.
Contribution
It introduces a new comparison of orbital frequencies between analytic models and numerical neutron star solutions, emphasizing the role of multipole moments in rapid rotation regimes.
Findings
PRS solution more accurately predicts ISCO radii than other models.
High-order multipole moments significantly influence orbital frequencies.
Results help differentiate black holes from neutron stars using QPOs.
Abstract
Whether analytic exact vacuum(electrovacuum) solutions of the Einstein(Einstein-Maxwell) field equations can accurately describe or not the exterior spacetime of compact stars remains still an interesting open question in Relativistic Astrophysics. As an attempt to establish their level of accuracy, the radii of the Innermost Stable Circular Orbits (ISCOs) of test particles given by analytic exterior spacetime geometries have been compared with the ones given by numerical solutions for neutron stars (NSs) obeying a realistic equation of state (EoS). It has been so shown that the six-parametric solution of Pach\'on, Rueda, and Sanabria (2006) (hereafter PRS) is more accurate to describe the NS ISCO radii than other analytic models. We propose here an additional test of accuracy for analytic exterior geometries based on the comparison of orbital frequencies of neutral test particles. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
