Stars Don't Eat Their Young Migrating Planets - Empirical Constraints On Planet Migration Halting Mechanisms

TL;DR

This study empirically constrains planet migration halting mechanisms by analyzing exoplanet distributions, finding tidal halting best explains confirmed hot Jupiters and suggesting additional physics are needed in tidal models.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian framework to compare different migration halting models against empirical exoplanet data, highlighting tidal halting as the most consistent mechanism for confirmed hot Jupiters.

Findings

Tidal halting best fits confirmed hot Jupiter distributions.

A correlation exists between halting distance and stellar mass.

Power law exponents suggest missing physics in tidal models.

Abstract

Abridged: The discovery of "hot Jupiters" very close to their parent stars confirmed that Jovian planets migrate inward via several potential mechanisms. We present empirical constraints on planet migration halting mechanisms. We compute model density functions of close-in exoplanets in the orbital semi-major axis - stellar mass plane to represent planet migration that is halted via several mechanisms, including the interior 1:2 resonance with the magnetospheric disk truncation radius, the interior 1:2 resonance with the dust sublimation radius, and several scenarios for tidal halting. The models differ in the predicted power law dependence of the exoplanet orbital semi-major axis as a function stellar mass, and thus we also include a power law model with the exponent as a free parameter. We use a Bayesian analysis to assess the model success in reproducing empirical distributions of confirmed exoplanets and Kepler candidates that orbit interior to 0.1 AU. Our results confirm a correlation of the halting distance with stellar mass. Tidal halting provides the best fit to the empirical distribution of confirmed Jovian exoplanets at a statistically robust level, consistent with the Kozai mechanism and the spin-orbit misalignment of a substantial fraction of hot Jupiters. For Kepler candidates, which have a more restricted range in stellar mass compared to confirmed planets, we are unable to discern between the tidal dissipation and magnetospheric disk truncation braking mechanisms at a statistically significant level. The power law model favors exponents in the range of 0.38-0.9. This is larger than that predicted for tidal halting (0.23-0.33), which suggests that additional physics may be missing in the tidal halting theory.