Inertial frames without the relativity principle
Valentina Baccetti (Victoria University of Wellington), Kyle Tate, (Victoria University of Wellington), and Matt Visser (Victoria University of, Wellington)

TL;DR
This paper explores how inertial frames can be characterized without relying on the relativity principle, revealing that linear transformations form a groupoid and allowing for consistent physics despite Lorentz symmetry violations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that meaningful spacetime transformations and physics rules can be derived without the relativity principle, introducing models with minimal Lorentz invariance violations.
Findings
Transformations form a groupoid/pseudo-group without the relativity principle
Derived rules for space-time, velocities, energy, and momentum transformations
Presented models with confined or velocity-dependent Lorentz violations
Abstract
Ever since the work of von Ignatowsky circa 1910 it has been known (if not always widely appreciated) that the relativity principle, combined with the basic and fundamental physical assumptions of locality, linearity, and isotropy, leads almost uniquely to either the Lorentz transformations of special relativity or to Galileo's transformations of classical Newtonian mechanics. Thus, if one wishes to entertain the possibility of Lorentz symmetry breaking within the context of the class of local physical theories, then it seems likely that one will have to abandon (or at the very least grossly modify) the relativity principle. Working within the framework of local physics, we reassess the notion of spacetime transformations between inertial frames in the absence of the relativity principle, arguing that significant and nontrivial physics can still be extracted as long as the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
