Common persistence in conditional variance: A reconsideration
Chang-Shuai Li

TL;DR
This paper critiques the flaws in co-persistence theory for conditional variance, introduces a new measure based on decay half-life, and applies an exhaustive search to identify co-persistent vectors in European stock volatilities.
Contribution
It proposes a revised approach to co-persistence in variance using decay half-life and exhaustive search, addressing previous theoretical limitations.
Findings
Identifies flaws in existing co-persistence theory
Introduces decay half-life as a persistence measure
Finds co-persistence in European stock return volatility
Abstract
This paper demonstrates the flaws of co-persistence theory proposed by Bollerslev and Engle (1993) which cause the theory can hardly be applied. With the introduction of the half-life of decay coefficient as the measure of the persistence, and both the weak definition of persistence and co-persistence in variance, this study attempts to solve the problems by using exhaustive search algorithm for obtaining co-persistent vector. In addition, this method is illustrated to research the co-persistence of stock return volatility in 10 European countries.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Market Dynamics and Volatility · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
