Predictions for mass-loss rates and terminal wind velocities of massive O-type stars
L. E. Muijres (Amsterdam), Jorick S. Vink (Armagh), A. de Koter, (Amsterdam), P.E. Mueller (Keele), N. Langer (Bonn)

TL;DR
This study predicts mass-loss rates and wind velocities for massive O-type stars using advanced models, revealing a fundamental limit for stars below a certain luminosity and confirming the accuracy of existing prescriptions for more luminous stars.
Contribution
It introduces a new grid of predictions for O star winds and highlights a fundamental luminosity threshold affecting wind initiation, testing and validating radiation-driven wind models.
Findings
Models fail for stars below log(L/Lsun)=5.2 due to insufficient momentum.
The boundary between wind initiation and failure is at spectral type O6/O6.5.
Predicted mass-loss rates agree with Vink et al. 2000 for luminous stars.
Abstract
Mass loss forms an important aspect of the evolution of massive stars, as well as for the enrichment of the surrounding ISM. Our goal is to predict accurate mass-loss rates and terminal wind velocities. These quantities can be compared to empirical values, thereby testing radiation-driven wind models. One specific issue is that of the "weak-wind problem", where empirically derived mass-loss rates fall orders of magnitude short of predicted values. We employ an established Monte Carlo model and a recently suggested new line acceleration formalism to solve the wind dynamics consistently. We provide a new grid of mass-loss rates and terminal wind velocities of O stars, and compare the values to empirical results. Our models fail to provide mass-loss rates for main-sequence stars below a luminosity of log(L/Lsun) = 5.2, where we run into a fundamental limit. At luminosities below this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
