A Description of Quasar Variability Measured Using Repeated SDSS and POSS Imaging
Chelsea L. MacLeod, Zeljko Ivezic, Branimir Sesar, Wim de Vries,, Christopher S. Kochanek, Brandon C. Kelly, Andrew C. Becker, Robert H., Lupton, Patrick B. Hall, Gordon T. Richards, Scott F. Anderson, Donald P., Schneider

TL;DR
This paper analyzes quasar optical variability using SDSS and POSS imaging data, demonstrating that a damped random walk model effectively describes their brightness changes over time scales of days to years.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive statistical description of quasar variability and validates the damped random walk model across a large dataset from SDSS and POSS surveys.
Findings
Quasar variability follows a damped random walk model.
Variability amplitude correlates with luminosity, black hole mass, and wavelength.
Model predictions align with observed large magnitude changes.
Abstract
We provide a quantitative description and statistical interpretation of the optical continuum variability of quasars. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) has obtained repeated imaging in five UV-to-IR photometric bands for 33,881 spectroscopically confirmed quasars. About 10,000 quasars have an average of 60 observations in each band obtained over a decade along Stripe 82 (S82), whereas the remaining ~25,000 have 2-3 observations due to scan overlaps. The observed time lags span the range from a day to almost 10 years, and constrain quasar variability at rest-frame time lags of up to 4 years, and at rest-frame wavelengths from 1000A to 6000A. We publicly release a user-friendly catalog of quasars from the SDSS Data Release 7 that have been observed at least twice in SDSS or once in both SDSS and the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey, and we use it to analyze the ensemble properties of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
