Template fitting of WMAP 7-year data: anomalous dust or flattening synchrotron emission?
M. W. Peel, C. Dickinson, R. D. Davies, A. J. Banday, T. R. Jaffe, J., L. Jonas

TL;DR
This study analyzes WMAP 7-year data to determine whether anomalous microwave emission is due to spinning dust grains or flattened synchrotron radiation, finding evidence supporting the spinning dust hypothesis.
Contribution
It provides a detailed cross-correlation analysis using multiple synchrotron templates to assess the nature of anomalous microwave emission.
Findings
Small flattening in synchrotron spectral indices (~0.05) at 2.3 GHz.
Dust-correlated emission remains largely unaffected by synchrotron template choice.
Results support spinning dust grains as the primary source of anomalous emission.
Abstract
Anomalous microwave emission at 20-40 GHz has been detected across our Galactic sky. It is highly correlated with thermal dust emission and hence it is thought to be due to spinning dust grains. Alternatively, this emission could be due to synchrotron radiation with a flattening (hard) spectral index. We cross-correlate synchrotron, free-free and thermal dust templates with the WMAP 7-year maps using synchrotron templates at both 408 MHz and 2.3 GHz to assess the amount of flat synchrotron emission that is present, and the impact that this has on the correlations with the other components. We find that there is only a small amount of flattening visible in the synchrotron spectral indices by 2.3 GHz, of around \Delta \beta ~ 0.05, and that the significant level of dust-correlated emission in the lowest WMAP bands is largely unaffected by the choice of synchrotron template, particularly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
