Impact of technological synchronicity on prospects for CETI
Marko Horvat, Anamari Naki\'c, Ivana Oto\v{c}an

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the probability of technological synchronicity among extraterrestrial civilizations and its implications for SETI, suggesting that a significant number of civilizations must exist for a high likelihood of contact within 20 years.
Contribution
It introduces a mathematical framework to estimate the number of civilizations needed for synchronized technological development to enable contact, considering both leakage and deliberate signaling.
Findings
At least 138-4991 civilizations are needed for a 95% chance of detecting signals in 20 years.
Approximately 1497 civilizations are required for a high probability of deliberate communication.
The probability of contact depends heavily on the number of civilizations and their technological synchronicity.
Abstract
For over 50 years, astronomers have searched the skies for evidence of electromagnetic signals from extraterrestrial civilizations that have reached or surpassed our level of technological development. Although often overlooked or given as granted, the parallel use of an equivalent communication technology is a necessary prerequisite for establishing contact in both leakage and deliberate messaging strategies. Civilization advancements, especially accelerating change and exponential growth, lessen the perspective for a simultaneous technological status of civilizations thus putting hard constraints on the likelihood of a dialogue. In this paper we consider the mathematical probability of technological synchronicity of our own and a number of other hypothetical extraterrestrial civilizations and explore the most likely scenarios for their concurrency. If SETI projects rely on a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
