On the Evolution of the Star Formation Rate Function of Massive Galaxies. Constraints at 0.4<z<1.8 from the GOODS-MUSIC Catalogue
Fabio Fontanot (INAF, HITS), Stefano Cristiani (INAF), Paola Santini, (INAF), Adriano Fontana (INAF), Andrea Grazian (INAF), Rachel S. Somerville, (STScI, JHU)

TL;DR
This study investigates the evolution of the star formation rate function of massive galaxies from redshift 0.4 to 1.8 using multiwavelength data, revealing discrepancies between observations and galaxy formation models that challenge current theories.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of observed and simulated SFRFs over this redshift range, highlighting key differences and constraints for galaxy evolution models.
Findings
Theoretical SFRFs are well described by a double power law.
Observed SFRF shows a double peaked structure absent in models.
Models overpredict low SFR galaxy densities at high redshift.
Abstract
[abridged] We study the evolution of the Star Formation Rate Function (SFRF) of massive galaxies over the 0.4<z<1.8 redshift range and its implications for our understanding of the physical processes responsible for galaxy evolution. We use multiwavelength observations included in the GOODS-MUSIC catalogue, which provides a suitable coverage of the spectral region from 0.3 to 24 micron and either spectroscopic or photometric redshifts for each object. Individual SFRs have been obtained by combining UV and 24 micron observations, when the latter were available. For all other sources an "SED fitting" SFR estimate has been considered. We then define a stellar mass limited sample, complete in the Mstar>1.e10 Msun range and determine the SFRF using the 1/Vmax algorithm. We define simulated galaxy catalogues based on three different semi-analytical models of galaxy formation and evolution. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
