The power spectrum from the angular distribution of galaxies in the CFHTLS-Wide fields at redshift ~0.7
B. R. Granett, L. Guzzo, J. Coupon, S. Arnouts, P. Hudelot, O. Ilbert,, H. J. McCracken, Y. Mellier, C. Adami, J. Bel, M. Bolzonella, D. Bottini, A., Cappi, O. Cucciati, S. de la Torre, P. Franzetti, A. Fritz, B. Garilli, A., Iovino, J. Krywult, V. Le Brun, O. Le Fevre

TL;DR
This paper measures the large-scale galaxy power spectrum at redshifts 0.5 to 1.2 using CFHTLS data and VIPERS redshifts, providing insights into the large-scale structure and galaxy bias.
Contribution
It presents a novel method to deproject angular galaxy distributions into three-dimensional power spectra using maximum likelihood estimation.
Findings
Galaxy bias measured as b_g=1.38 ± 0.05
Matter density Omega_m=0.30 ± 0.06
First large-scale structure measurement from VIPERS data
Abstract
We measure the real-space galaxy power spectrum on large scales at redshifts 0.5 to 1.2 using optical colour-selected samples from the CFHT Legacy Survey. With the redshift distributions measured with a preliminary ~14000 spectroscopic redshifts from the VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS), we deproject the angular distribution and directly estimate the three-dimensional power spectrum. We use a maximum likelihood estimator that is optimal for a Gaussian random field giving well-defined window functions and error estimates. This measurement presents an initial look at the large-scale structure field probed by the VIPERS survey. We measure the galaxy bias of the VIPERS-like sample to be b_g=1.38 +- 0.05 (sigma_8=0.8) on scales k<0.2h/mpc averaged over 0.5<z<1.2. We further investigate three photometric redshift slices, and marginalising over the bias factors while keeping…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
