The Lick AGN Monitoring Project: Recalibrating Single-Epoch Virial Black Hole Mass Estimates
Daeseong Park, Jong-Hak Woo, Tommaso Treu, Aaron J. Barth, Misty C., Bentz, Vardha N. Bennert, Gabriela Canalizo, Alexei V. Filippenko, Elinor, Gates, Jenny E. Greene, Matthew A. Malkan, Jonelle Walsh

TL;DR
This study refines single-epoch black hole mass estimates for low-mass AGNs by analyzing spectral variability and introducing a correction factor, reducing systematic uncertainties in mass calculations.
Contribution
It provides a recalibration of SE virial mass estimators for low-mass AGNs based on spectral variability analysis and line profile comparisons.
Findings
Uncertainty due to variability is about 0.05 dex (12%).
Total SE mass estimate uncertainty is approximately 0.46 dex.
A line-width dependent virial factor improves mass estimates for low-mass AGNs.
Abstract
We investigate the calibration and uncertainties of black hole mass estimates based on the single-epoch (SE) method, using homogeneous and high-quality multi-epoch spectra obtained by the Lick Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) Monitoring Project for 9 local Seyfert 1 galaxies with black hole masses < 10^8 M_sun. By decomposing the spectra into their AGN and stellar components, we study the variability of the single-epoch Hbeta line width (full width at half-maximum intensity, FWHM_Hbeta; or dispersion, sigma_Hbeta) and of the AGN continuum luminosity at 5100A (L_5100). From the distribution of the "virial products" (~ FWHM_Hbeta^2 L_5100^0.5 or sigma_Hbeta^2 L_5100^0.5) measured from SE spectra, we estimate the uncertainty due to the combined variability as ~ 0.05 dex (12%). This is subdominant with respect to the total uncertainty in SE mass estimates, which is dominated by uncertainties…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
