A warning on the determination of the halo mass
Dario Nunez, Alma X. Gonzalez Morales, Jorge L. Cervantes-Cota,, Tonatiuh Matos

TL;DR
This paper critically examines methods for determining dark matter halo mass, highlighting how extra assumptions can bias results and lead to inconsistencies in understanding dark matter properties.
Contribution
It identifies common biases and assumptions in halo mass estimation studies, emphasizing the need for careful analysis to avoid misleading conclusions.
Findings
Extra assumptions often bias halo mass estimates
Some studies incorporate assumptions about dark matter nature
Inconsistent results can arise from biased methodologies
Abstract
We summarize our studies on the determination of the mass of the dark matter halo, based on observations of rotation curves of test particles or of the gravitational lensing. As we show, it is not uncommon that some studies on the nature of dark matter include extra assumptions, some even on the very nature of the dark matter, what we want to determine!, and that bias the studies and the results obtained from the observation and, in some cases, imply an inconsistent system altogether.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
