The structures and total (minor + major) merger histories of massive galaxies up to z = 3 in the HST GOODS NICMOS Survey: A possible solution to the size evolution problem
Asa F. L. Bluck, Christopher J. Conselice, Fernando Buitrago, Ruth, Gruetzbauch, Carlos Hoyos, Alice Mortlock, Amanda E. Bauer

TL;DR
This study analyzes the merger history of massive galaxies up to redshift 3 using deep HST imaging, finding that mergers significantly contribute to their size evolution and mass growth over cosmic time.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive merger history for massive galaxies up to z=3, linking merger activity to observed size evolution and validating methods with simulations.
Findings
Merger fraction at high redshift is approximately 23%.
Total mergers since z=3 are about 4.5 per galaxy.
Merging accounts for most of the size evolution observed.
Abstract
We investigate the total major (> 1:4 by stellar mass) and minor (> 1:100 by stellar mass) merger history of a population of 80 massive (M_* > 10^11 M_sol) galaxies at high redshifts (z = 1.7 - 3). We utilize extremely deep and high resolution HST H-band imaging from the GOODS NICMOS Survey (GNS), which corresponds to rest-frame optical wavelengths at the redshifts probed. We find that massive galaxies at high redshifts are often morphologically disturbed, with a CAS deduced merger fraction f_m = 0.23 +/- 0.05 at z = 1.7 - 3. We find close accord between close pair methods (within 30 kpc apertures) and CAS methods for deducing major merger fractions at all redshifts. We deduce the total (minor + major) merger history of massive galaxies with M_* > 10^9 M_sol galaxies, and find that this scales roughly linearly with log-stellar-mass and magnitude range. We test our close pair methods by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
