On the stability of radiation-pressure-dominated cavities
Rolf Kuiper, Hubert Klahr, Henrik Beuther, and Thomas Henning

TL;DR
This study compares two radiation transport methods in modeling radiation-pressure-driven cavities around massive stars, revealing that the choice of method significantly affects the predicted stability of these cavities.
Contribution
It demonstrates that gray flux-limited diffusion underestimates radiative forces, artificially inducing instabilities not present when using ray-tracing methods.
Findings
FLD leads to instability in cavity shells.
RT methods show stable, super-Eddington radiation pressure.
Gray FLD underestimates opacity and promotes instability.
Abstract
Context: When massive stars exert a radiation pressure onto their environment that is higher than their gravitational attraction, they launch a radiation-pressure-driven outflow. It has been claimed that a radiative Rayleigh-Taylor instability should lead to the collapse of the outflow cavity and foster the growth of massive stars. Aims: We investigate the stability of idealized radiation-pressure-dominated cavities, focusing on its dependence on the radiation transport approach for the stellar radiation feedback. Methods: We compare two different methods for stellar radiation feedback: gray flux-limited diffusion (FLD) and ray-tracing (RT). We also derive simple analytical models to support our findings. Results: Only the FLD cases lead to prominent instability in the cavity shell. The RT cases do not show such instability. The gray FLD method underestimates the opacity at the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
