How do Most Planets Form? -- Constraints on Disk Instability from Direct Imaging
Markus Janson, Mariangela Bonavita, Hubert Klahr, David Lafreniere

TL;DR
This study uses direct imaging data to constrain the frequency of wide-orbit planets formed by disk instability, finding such planets are rare across various star types, thus supporting core accretion as the dominant formation mechanism.
Contribution
The paper extends previous analysis to FGKM stars, providing new constraints on disk instability's role in planet formation across different star types.
Findings
Disk instability-formed companions are rare (<8%) around FGKM stars.
Frequency of such companions is always <10% at 99% confidence for 5-500 AU.
Core accretion is likely the dominant planet formation mechanism across all star types.
Abstract
Core accretion and disk instability have traditionally been regarded as the two competing possible paths of planet formation. In recent years, evidence have accumulated in favor of core accretion as the dominant mode, at least for close-in planets. However, it might be hypothesized that a significant population of wide planets formed by disk instabilities could exist at large separations, forming an invisible majority. In previous work, we addressed this issue through a direct imaging survey of B2--A0-type stars, and concluded that <30% of such stars form and retain planets and brown dwarfs through disk instability, leaving core accretion as the likely dominant mechanism. In this paper, we extend this analysis to FGKM-type stars by applying a similar analysis to the Gemini Deep Planet Survey (GDPS) sample. The results strengthen the conclusion that substellar companions formed and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
