g-Factors and diamagnetic coefficients of electrons, holes and excitons in InAs/InP quantum dots
J. van Bree, A. Yu. Silov, P. M. Koenraad, M. E. Flatt\'e, C. E. Pryor

TL;DR
This study calculates electron, hole, and exciton g-factors and diamagnetic coefficients in InAs/InP quantum dots using envelope-function theory, revealing their dependence on quantum dot properties and comparing well with experimental data.
Contribution
It provides a detailed theoretical analysis of g-factors and diamagnetic coefficients in quantum dots, including the effects of Coulomb interaction and remote-band contributions.
Findings
Electron g-factor linked to valence envelope functions with non-zero orbital momentum.
Exciton diamagnetic coefficients depend on quantum dot height and effective mass.
Theoretical results align with experimental data, especially when Coulomb interaction is included.
Abstract
The electron, hole, and exciton g-factors and diamagnetic coefficients have been calculated using envelope-function theory for cylindrical InAs/InP quantum dots in the presence of a magnetic field parallel to the dot symmetry axis. A clear connection is established between the electron g-factor and the amplitude of the those valence-state envelope functions which possess non-zero orbital momentum associated with the envelope function. The dependence of the exciton diamagnetic coefficients on the quantum dot height is found to correlate with the energy dependence of the effective mass. Calculated exciton g-factor and diamagnetic coefficients, constructed from the values associated with the electron and hole constituents of the exciton, match experimental data well, however including the Coulomb interaction between the electron and hole states improves the agreement. Remote-band…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
