Reconstruction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction
Stephen D. Bartlett, Terry Rudolph, and Robert W. Spekkens

TL;DR
This paper reconstructs Gaussian quantum mechanics from classical Liouville mechanics by imposing an epistemic restriction that limits knowledge, resulting in a theory that reproduces quantum phenomena and supports an epistemic interpretation of quantum states.
Contribution
It introduces a foundational postulate imposing classical uncertainty constraints that lead to Gaussian quantum mechanics, bridging classical and quantum descriptions.
Findings
Reproduces Gaussian quantum statistics from classical phase space with epistemic restrictions
Derives quantum-like transformations and measurements within a classical framework
Supports epistemic view of quantum states as incomplete knowledge
Abstract
How would the world appear to us if its ontology was that of classical mechanics but every agent faced a restriction on how much they could come to know about the classical state? We show that in most respects, it would appear to us as quantum. The statistical theory of classical mechanics, which specifies how probability distributions over phase space evolve under Hamiltonian evolution and under measurements, is typically called Liouville mechanics, so the theory we explore here is Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction. The particular epistemic restriction we posit as our foundational postulate specifies two constraints. The first constraint is a classical analogue of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle -- the second-order moments of position and momentum defined by the phase-space distribution that characterizes an agent's knowledge are required to satisfy the same…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
