Observational constraints of the gravitational waves in the Brans-Dicke theory: Einstein frame and Jordan-Brans-Dicke frame
R. C. Freitas, S. V. B. Gon\c{c}alves

TL;DR
This paper compares the predictions of primordial gravitational waves in Brans-Dicke theory across two conformally related frames, analyzing observable quantities and their consistency with General Relativity and experimental constraints.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of gravitational wave observables in Jordan-Brans-Dicke and Einstein frames, highlighting conditions for scale invariance and deviations from local tests.
Findings
Number of gravitons $N_k$ is consistent in both frames and with General Relativity for large Brans-Dicke parameter.
Scale invariance of the spectral index $n_T$ is achievable in both frames as $ ightarrow ightarrowty$.
Preferred values of $oldsymbol{oldsymbol{oldsymbol{ ext{omega}}}}$ differ from local experimental bounds.
Abstract
We investigate the quantum origin of the primordial cosmological gravitational waves in the Brans-Dicke theory in the two conformally related frames, the Jordan-Brans-Dicke frame and the Einstein frame. We calculated the theoretical observable in both frames and we compared both with General Relativity. We compute the number of gravitons produced during inflation and the observables: power spectrum , spectral index and energy density . The comparison shows that for the case of the particles number the results are the same in both frames and in General Relativity when the Brans-Dicke parameter is much bigger than unity. For the spectral index we show that it is possible to get a scale invariant perturbation in the Jordan-Brans-Dicke frame when and in the Einstein frame when . In both frames, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
