List Distinguishing Parameters of Trees

TL;DR

This paper investigates list distinguishing parameters of trees, establishing equalities between list and standard distinguishing numbers and providing bounds on the distinguishing chromatic number.

Contribution

It extends Cheng's enumerative technique to show that for trees, list and standard distinguishing numbers are equal, and bounds the distinguishing chromatic number.

Findings

D_l(T) = D(T) for any tree T

chi_D(T) = chi_{D_l}(T) for any tree T

chi_D(T) <= D(T) + 1 for any tree T

Abstract

A coloring of the vertices of a graph G is said to be distinguishing} provided no nontrivial automorphism of G preserves all of the vertex colors. The distinguishing number of G, D(G), is the minimum number of colors in a distinguishing coloring of G. The distinguishing chromatic number of G, chi_D(G), is the minimum number of colors in a distinguishing coloring of G that is also a proper coloring. Recently the notion of a distinguishing coloring was extended to that of a list distinguishing coloring. Given an assignment L= {L(v) : v in V(G)} of lists of available colors to the vertices of G, we say that G is (properly) L-distinguishable if there is a (proper) distinguishing coloring f of G such that f(v) is in L(v) for all v. The list distinguishing number of G, D_l(G), is the minimum integer k such that G is L-distinguishable for any list assignment L with |L(v)| = k for all v. Similarly, the list distinguishing chromatic number of G, denoted chi_{D_l}(G) is the minimum integer k such that G is properly L-distinguishable for any list assignment L with |L(v)| = k for all v. In this paper, we study these distinguishing parameters for trees, and in particular extend an enumerative technique of Cheng to show that for any tree T, D_l(T) = D(T), chi_D(T)=chi_{D_l}(T), and chi_D(T) <= D(T) + 1.