Probing the neutrino mass hierarchy with the rise time of a supernova burst
Pasquale Dario Serpico (LAPTh, Annecy), Sovan Chakraborty (II Inst., Theor. Phys., Hamburg University), Tobias Fischer (GSI, Tech. Univ., Darmstadt), Lorenz Hudepohl, Hans-Thomas Janka (MPA, Garching), Alessandro, Mirizzi (II Inst. Theor. Phys., Hamburg University)

TL;DR
This study explores how the rise time of a supernova's neutrino lightcurve, observable with IceCube, can reveal the neutrino mass hierarchy, showing that the inverted hierarchy produces a faster rise time than the normal hierarchy.
Contribution
It demonstrates that supernova neutrino rise times can distinguish neutrino mass hierarchies and assesses the robustness of this signature across various simulations.
Findings
Faster rise times indicate inverted hierarchy.
Hierarchies are distinguishable at 99% confidence for Galactic SNe.
Robustness of the signature across models suggests potential for experimental detection.
Abstract
The rise time of a Galactic supernova (SN) bar-nue lightcurve, observable at a high-statistics experiment such as the IceCube Cherenkov detector, can provide a diagnostic tool for the neutrino mass hierarchy at "large" 1-3 leptonic mixing angle theta_13. Thanks to the combination of matter suppression of collective effects at early postbounce times on one hand and the presence of the ordinary Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effect in the outer layers of the SN on the other hand, a sufficiently fast rise time on O(100) ms scale is indicative of an inverted mass hierarchy. We investigate results from an extensive set of stellar core-collapse simulations, providing a first exploration of the astrophysical robustness of these features. We find that for all the models analyzed (sharing the same weak interaction microphysics) the rise times for the same hierarchy are similar not only…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
