Unpredictability and Computational Irreducibility
Herve Zwirn, Jean-Paul Delahaye

TL;DR
This paper formalizes the concept of computational irreducibility, demonstrating that for such systems, predicting the nth state cannot be faster than simulating the entire process, with initial focus on cellular automata and general computable functions.
Contribution
It provides a robust formal definition of computational irreducibility applicable to cellular automata and general computable functions, linking irreducibility to the impossibility of shortcut computations.
Findings
Irreducible systems cannot be predicted faster than simulation.
Formal definition of computational irreducibility for cellular automata.
Extension of the concept to general computable functions.
Abstract
We explore several concepts for analyzing the intuitive notion of computational irreducibility and we propose a robust formal definition, first in the field of cellular automata and then in the general field of any computable function f from N to N. We prove that, through a robust definition of what means "to be unable to compute the nth step without having to follow the same path than simulating the automaton or the function", this implies genuinely, as intuitively expected, that if the behavior of an object is computationally irreducible, no computation of its nth state can be faster than the simulation itself.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCellular Automata and Applications · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory
