Optical codeword demodulation with error rates below standard quantum limit using a conditional nulling receiver
Jian Chen, Jonathan L. Habif, Zachary Dutton, Richard Lazarus, Saikat, Guha

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the first experimental joint-detection receiver for optical communication that surpasses the standard quantum limit, achieving lower error rates using a conditional nulling approach with practical implications for deep-space communication.
Contribution
The paper presents the first experimental implementation of a joint-detection receiver that surpasses the standard quantum limit using a conditional nulling method with optimized coherent pulse nulling and quantum feedforward.
Findings
Error rate 40% below standard quantum limit
Demonstration of a practical joint-detection receiver
Potential for improved deep-space communication systems
Abstract
The quantum states of two laser pulses---coherent states---are never mutually orthogonal, making perfect discrimination impossible. Even so, coherent states can achieve the ultimate quantum limit for capacity of a classical channel, the Holevo capacity. Attaining this requires the receiver to make joint-detection measurements on long codeword blocks, optical implementations of which remain unknown. We report the first experimental demonstration of a joint-detection receiver, demodulating quaternary pulse-position-modulation (PPM) codewords at a word error rate of up to 40% (2.2 dB) below that attained with direct-detection, the largest error-rate improvement over the standard quantum limit reported to date. This is accomplished with a conditional nulling receiver, which uses optimized-amplitude coherent pulse nulling, single photon detection and quantum feedforward. We further show how…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
