Future constraints on neutrino isocurvature perturbations in the curvaton scenario
Eleonora Di Valentino, Massimiliano Lattanzi, Gianpiero Mangano,, Alessandro Melchiorri, Pasquale D. Serpico

TL;DR
This paper investigates how future cosmic microwave background experiments can constrain neutrino isocurvature perturbations in the curvaton scenario, focusing on parameters like b3, b4N_eff, and neutrino degeneracy.
Contribution
It provides forecasted constraints on neutrino isocurvature perturbations and related parameters for upcoming experiments, extending understanding of neutrino properties in the early universe.
Findings
Planck can limit b3 to 5.3x10^-3 and b4N_eff to 0.16.
SPIDER can limit b3 to 1.2x10^-2 and b4N_eff to 0.40.
CMBPol can further tighten constraints to b3 < 1.5x10^-3 and b4N_eff < 0.043.
Abstract
In the curvaton scenario, residual isocurvature perturbations can be imprinted in the cosmic neutrino component after the decay of the curvaton field, implying in turn a non-zero chemical potential in the neutrino distribution. We study the constraints that future experiments like Planck, SPIDER or CMBPol will be able to put on the amplitude of isocurvature perturbations in the neutrino component. We express our results in terms of the square root \gamma of the non-adiabaticity parameter \alpha and of the extra relativistic degrees of freedom \Delta N_eff. Assuming a fiducial model with purely adiabatic fluctuations, we find that Planck (SPIDER) will be able to put the following upper limits at the 1sigma level: \gamma < 5.3x10^-3 (1.2x10^-2) and \Delta N_eff < 0.16 (0.40) . CMBPol will further improve these constraints to \gamma < 1.5x10^-3 and \Delta N_eff < 0.043. Finally, we recast…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
