Fast Learning Rate of Non-Sparse Multiple Kernel Learning and Optimal Regularization Strategies
Taiji Suzuki

TL;DR
This paper establishes a theoretical framework for understanding the learning rates of Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) with various regularizations, revealing when dense or sparse regularizations are preferable based on the complexity of the RKHSs.
Contribution
It introduces a unifying theoretical tool to derive fast learning rates for MKL with arbitrary mixed-norm regularizations, and compares their effectiveness based on RKHS complexity.
Findings
Dense regularizations outperform sparse ones in inhomogeneous settings.
-regularization is optimal in homogeneous complexity scenarios.
The proposed bounds achieve the minimax lower bound in certain settings.
Abstract
In this paper, we give a new generalization error bound of Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) for a general class of regularizations, and discuss what kind of regularization gives a favorable predictive accuracy. Our main target in this paper is dense type regularizations including \ellp-MKL. According to the recent numerical experiments, the sparse regularization does not necessarily show a good performance compared with dense type regularizations. Motivated by this fact, this paper gives a general theoretical tool to derive fast learning rates of MKL that is applicable to arbitrary mixed-norm-type regularizations in a unifying manner. This enables us to compare the generalization performances of various types of regularizations. As a consequence, we observe that the homogeneity of the complexities of candidate reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHSs) affects which regularization strategy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Numerical methods in inverse problems · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
