Predictions for p+Pb at 4.4A TeV to Test Initial State Nuclear Shadowing at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider
G. G. Barnafoldi (KFKI Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary), J., Barrette (McGill University, Montreal, Canada), M. Gyulassy (Columbia, University, New York, USA), P. Levai (KFKI Research Institute, Budapest,, Hungary), V. Topor Pop,(McGill University, Montreal, Canada)

TL;DR
This paper compares different nuclear shadowing models for p+Pb collisions at 4.4A TeV at the LHC, finding that global fit models predict minimal suppression, unlike fixed Q^2 models which suggest significant suppression.
Contribution
It provides a comparison of shadowing models using collinear factorized pQCD predictions to clarify initial state effects at LHC energies.
Findings
Global fit shadowing models predict R_{pPb} ≈ 1 with minimal suppression.
Fixed Q^2 shadowing models predict R_{pPb} ≈ 0.6-0.7, indicating larger suppression.
Observation of R_{pPb} < 0.6 would challenge current understanding of initial state effects.
Abstract
Collinear factorized perturbative QCD model predictions are compared for p+Pb at 4.4A TeV to test nuclear shadowing of parton distribution at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The nuclear modification factor (NMF), R_{pPb}(y=0,p_T<20 GeV/c) = dn_{p Pb} /(N_{coll}(b)dn_{pp}), is computed with electron-nucleus (e+A) global fit with different nuclear shadow distributions and compared to fixed Q^2 shadow ansatz used in Monte Carlo Heavy Ion Jet Interacting Generator (HIJING) type models. Due to rapid DGLAP reduction of shadowing with increasing Q^2 used in e+A global fit, our results confirm that no significant initial state suppression is expected (R_{pPb} (p_T) = 1 \pm 0.1) in the p_T range 5 to 20 GeV/ c. In contrast, the fixed Q^2 shadowing models assumed in HIJING type models predict in the above p_T range a sizable suppression, R_{pPb} (p_T) = 0.6-0.7 at mid-pseudorapidity that is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
