Accretion-Driven Evolution of Black Holes: Eddington Ratios, Duty Cycles, and Active Galaxy Fractions
Francesco Shankar (1), David H. Weinberg (2), Jordi Miralda-Escude', (3,4) ((1) GEPI - Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Universite' Paris Diderot, (2), Ohio State University, (3) Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats,, (4) Institut de Ciencies del Cosmos

TL;DR
This paper develops semi-empirical models of supermassive black hole growth and AGN activity, incorporating observational constraints on Eddington ratios and active galaxy fractions to understand their evolution.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized continuity-equation framework with flexible Eddington ratio distributions, linking black hole growth, AGN fractions, and luminosity functions across cosmic time.
Findings
High AGN fractions at low redshift require declining Eddington ratios.
Eddington ratio distributions broaden at low redshift.
Matching local black hole mass functions suggests increased radiative efficiency for massive black holes.
Abstract
We develop semi-empirical models of the supermassive black hole and active galactic nucleus (AGN) populations, which incorporate the black hole growth implied by the observed AGN luminosity function assuming a radiative efficiency \epsilon, and a distribution of Eddington ratios \lambda. By generalizing these continuity-equation models to allow a distribution P(\lambda|mbh,z) we are able to draw on constraints from observationally estimated P(\lambda) distributions and active galaxy fractions while accounting for the luminosity thresholds of observational samples. We consider models with a Gaussian distribution of log \lambda, and Gaussians augmented with a power-law tail to low \lambda. Within our framework, reproducing the high observed AGN fractions at low redshift requires a characteristic Eddington ratio \lambda_c that declines at late times, and matching observed Eddington ratio…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
