Can the neutrino speed anomaly be defended?
J\"urgen Knobloch

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the claim of superluminal neutrino speeds by analyzing potential systematic errors in the OPERA experiment, questioning the assumption that proton timing directly reflects neutrino emission timing.
Contribution
It identifies two main sources of systematic errors—filter-induced group delay and beam movement—that could explain the neutrino speed anomaly without requiring superluminal velocities.
Findings
Systematic effects can account for the observed early neutrino arrival.
Filter group delay may introduce timing shifts in the measurement.
Beam movement during spill could affect the timing analysis.
Abstract
The OPERA collaboration reported [1] a measurement of the neutrino velocity exceeding the speed of light by 0.025%. For the 730 km distance from CERN in Geneva to the OPERA experiment an early arrival of the neutrinos of 60.7 ns is measured with an accuracy of \pm6.9 ns (stat.) and \pm7.4 ns (sys.). A basic assumption in the analysis is that the proton time structure represents exactly the time structure of the neutrino flux. In this manuscript, we challenge this assumption. We identify two main origins of systematic effects: a group delay due to low pass filters acting on the particular shape of the proton time distribution and a movement of the proton beam at the target during the leading and trailing slopes of the spill.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Neutrino Physics Research · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
