Evidence for dark matter modulation in CoGeNT?
Chiara Arina (RWTH Aachen), Jan Hamann (University of Aarhus), Roberto, Trotta (Imperial College London), Yvonne Y Y Wong (RWTH Aachen)

TL;DR
This study uses Bayesian model comparison to evaluate whether the CoGeNT modulation signal is best explained by dark matter interactions or other physics, finding moderate support for the dark matter hypothesis.
Contribution
It provides a Bayesian framework comparing multiple models for CoGeNT modulation, including dark matter and alternative physics explanations, with robustness checks against astrophysical uncertainties.
Findings
Dark matter models are weakly preferred over no modulation.
Dark matter hypothesis is favored over other physics explanations with odds up to 560:1.
Classical tests exclude no modulation at 1.6-2.3 sigma.
Abstract
We investigate the question of whether the recent modulation signal claimed by CoGeNT is best explained by the dark matter (DM) hypothesis from a Bayesian model comparison perspective. We consider five phenomenological explanations for the data: no modulation signal, modulation due to DM, modulation due to DM compatible with the total CoGeNT rate, and a signal coming from other physics with a free phase but annual period, or with a free phase and a free period. In each scenario, we assign to the free parameters physically motivated priors. We find that while the DM models are weakly preferred to the no modulation model, but when compared to models where the modulation is due to other physics, the DM hypothesis is favoured with odds ranging from 185:1 to 560:1. This result is robust even when astrophysical uncertainties are taken into account and the impact of priors assessed.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
