Analysis of two SMC HII Regions Considering Thermal Inhomogeneities: Implications for the Determinations of Extragalactic Chemical Abundances
Maria A. Pe\~na-Guerrero, Antonio Peimbert, Manuel Peimbert, Maria T., Ruiz

TL;DR
This study investigates thermal inhomogeneities in two SMC HII regions to improve the accuracy of extragalactic chemical abundance measurements, revealing significant underestimations when neglecting temperature variations.
Contribution
It introduces methods to quantify thermal inhomogeneities in HII regions and demonstrates their impact on chemical abundance determinations, providing correction factors for low metallicity regions.
Findings
Thermal inhomogeneities cause underestimation of gaseous abundances by nearly a factor of 2.
Correcting for thermal inhomogeneities increases O/H ratios by 0.25-0.45 dex.
Different methods yield consistent t^2 values, validating the approach.
Abstract
We present long slit spectrophotometry considering the presence of thermal inhomogeneities (t^2) of two HII regions in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC): NGC 456 and NGC 460. Physical conditions and chemical abundances were determined for three positions in NGC 456 and one position in NGC 460, first under the assumption of uniform temperature and then allowing for the possibility of thermal inhomogeneities. We determined t^2 values based on three different methods: i) by comparing the temperature derived using oxygen forbidden lines with the temperature derived using helium recombination lines, ii) by comparing the abundances derived from oxygen forbidden lines with those derived from oxygen recombination lines, and iii) by comparing the abundances derived from ultraviolet carbon forbidden lines with those derived from optical carbon recombination lines. The first two methods averaged…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
