A note on the lack of symmetry in the graphical lasso
Benjamin T. Rolfs, Bala Rajaratnam

TL;DR
This paper highlights the asymmetry issue in the graphical lasso's inverse covariance estimates, which can affect multivariate analysis, and discusses causes and potential solutions.
Contribution
It identifies the inexact and asymmetric nature of the inverse covariance estimates produced by the graphical lasso and proposes remedies to address this problem.
Findings
The inverse covariance estimates from graphical lasso can be asymmetric.
Asymmetry increases with less regularization and non-sparse true inverse covariance matrices.
Asymmetry may lead to invalid eigenvalues and affect multivariate procedures.
Abstract
The graphical lasso (glasso) is a widely-used fast algorithm for estimating sparse inverse covariance matrices. The glasso solves an L1 penalized maximum likelihood problem and is available as an R library on CRAN. The output from the glasso, a regularized covariance matrix estimate a sparse inverse covariance matrix estimate, not only identify a graphical model but can also serve as intermediate inputs into multivariate procedures such as PCA, LDA, MANOVA, and others. The glasso indeed produces a covariance matrix estimate which solves the L1 penalized optimization problem in a dual sense; however, the method for producing the inverse covariance matrix estimator after this optimization is inexact and may produce asymmetric estimates. This problem is exacerbated when the amount of L1 regularization that is applied is small, which in turn is more likely to occur if the true underlying…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Statistical and numerical algorithms
