Quantifying the unknown: issues in simulation validation and their experimental impact
M. G. Pia, M. Batic, G. Hoff, P. Saracco, M. Begalli, M. Han, C. H Kim, and H. Seo, S. Hauf, M. Kuster, L. Quintieri, G. Weidenspointner, A., Zoglauer

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges in validating Monte Carlo simulations, focusing on quantifying uncertainties, especially epistemic ones, and their effects on experimental results, supported by applications and ongoing projects in Geant4.
Contribution
It introduces methods for uncertainty quantification in simulation validation and reports on ongoing efforts to investigate epistemic uncertainties in Geant4.
Findings
Methods for epistemic uncertainty quantification are discussed.
Applications demonstrate the impact of uncertainties on experimental results.
Ongoing projects aim to improve simulation reliability.
Abstract
The assessment of the reliability of Monte Carlo simulations is discussed, with emphasis on uncertainty quantification and the related impact on experimental results. Methods and techniques to account for epistemic uncertainties, i.e. for intrinsic knowledge gaps in physics modeling, are discussed with the support of applications to concrete experimental scenarios. Ongoing projects regarding the investigation of epistemic uncertainties in the Geant4 simulation toolkit are reported.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
