Optimizing future dark energy surveys for model selection goals
Catherine Watkinson, Andrew R. Liddle, Pia Mukherjee, and David, Parkinson

TL;DR
This paper presents a methodology to optimize future dark energy surveys for model selection, using Bayesian figures of merit and Monte Carlo methods, to improve the ability to distinguish between different dark energy models.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian model selection-based optimization approach for dark energy surveys, enhancing flexibility and interpretability over traditional figures of merit.
Findings
Optimal survey configurations can achieve high model selection performance at lower DETF FoM levels.
Bayes factor-based methods provide better insight into survey design effectiveness.
The approach is practical for surveys similar to SuMIRe PFS.
Abstract
We demonstrate a methodology for optimizing the ability of future dark energy surveys to answer model selection questions, such as `Is acceleration due to a cosmological constant or a dynamical dark energy model?'. Model selection Figures of Merit are defined, exploiting the Bayes factor, and surveys optimized over their design parameter space via a Monte Carlo method. As a specific example we apply our methods to generic multi-fibre baryon acoustic oscillation spectroscopic surveys, comparable to that proposed for SuMIRe PFS, and present implementations based on the Savage-Dickey Density Ratio that are both accurate and practical for use in optimization. It is shown that whilst the optimal surveys using model selection agree with those found using the Dark Energy Task Force (DETF) Figure of Merit, they provide better informed flexibility of survey configuration and an absolute scale…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
